Predicting the Oscar Nominees
Start your engines, itâ€™s awards season time! The nominations for the Golden Globes, the Screen Actorâ€™s Guild, and all of the other guilds have already been released, the Golden Globes are this Sunday, and the Oscar nominations come out tomorrow. What will they be? Iâ€™m so glad you askedâ€¦
In each category below, everything is listed in order of how likely I think a nomination is, and the films in bold are what I think actually will be nominated. And thanks to Grantland, whose format I stole for this piece.
Iâ€™m weighing in on 45 potential nominations, with the goal of getting at least 40 of them right.
Zero Dark Thirty
The Near Locks
Silver Linings Playbook
Life of Pi
At Least One of These
Beasts of the Southern Wild
Other (Unlikely) Possibilities
The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
The Dark Knight Rises
This is the toughest category to pick, because we donâ€™t even know how many nominees weâ€™re getting. Starting last year, the voting changed, so now we can get anywhere from five to ten nominees, purely dependent on how the voting gets spread out. The crux is this: for a movie to get nominated, at least five percent of the ballots have to list it number one. There are close to 6,000 people in the Academy, so that means a minimum of around 300 Academy members have to think a movie was the best of the year for a nomination to occur. And thatâ€™s the key hereâ€”it doesnâ€™t matter if every single person in the Academy thought something was in the yearâ€™s ten best, it only matters if 300 or so people thought it was the very best.
Consensus agreement suggests this was a very strong year for movies, and a lot of people assume that means weâ€™ll get the full ten nominees. But the math doesnâ€™t necessarily support that theory. Because thereâ€™s so much agreement about what this yearâ€™s very best films were (Lincoln, Zero Dark Thirty, & Argo), thatâ€™s likely to take a huge amount of the first place votes. If each of those films gets somewhere in the range of 15-25% of the first place votes, then that already leaves precious little space for the rest of the field.
Silver Linings Playbook, Les Miserables, and Life of Pi all feel pretty safely in, but after that, just about anything could happen. And one possibility is definitely that the nominations stop there. Some people are predicting that films widely liked by either younger Academy members (Django Unchained) or older Academy members (The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel) have a great chance to be nominated. But remember, the key isnâ€™t how widely liked a movie is, itâ€™s how passionately liked a movie is. Can you imagine 300 Academy members choosing either of those as the best film of the year? Perhaps you can, but Iâ€™ll be over here, respectfully disagreeing with you.
And that leaves the â€śartâ€ť films that gain small, yet passionate (thereâ€™s that important word again), followings. For many prognosticators, The Master has fallen out of the race and appears to be a peaked-too-early also-ran. But I think itâ€™s just the kind of movie that will succeed in the Academyâ€™s new voting system. Between itâ€™s memorably amazing acting and cinematography, and its high-brow artiness, itâ€™s easy to picture this being the type of film that a small group rallies around and puts at the top of the ballot (just like Tree of Life last year). But The Master is just one of four films that could benefit from this voting possibility, and that means they could all become victim to vote splitting. But my guess is Moonrise Kingdom comes through, while Amour and Beasts of the Southern Wild fall just short.
And as for the rest of the crowd pleasers, blame the system. Until the voting policies change again, the days of movies like The Full Monty, Seabiscuit, and The Blind Side sneaking into the Best Picture race are over.
Steven Spielberg â€“ Lincoln
Kathryn Bigelow â€“ Zero Dark Thirty
Ben Affleck â€“ ArgoÂ Â Â Â
Ang Lee â€“ Life of Pi
Probably Someone From This Group
Paul Thomas Anderson â€“ The Master
Michael Haneke â€“ Amour
Probably Not Someone From This Group
David O. Russell â€“ Silver Linings Playbook
Tom Hooper â€“ Les Miserables
Quentin Tarantino â€“ Django Unchained
Robert Zemeckis â€“ Flight
We basically know what four of the nominees will be here, but predicting the fifth is a bit tricky. The Golden Globes nominated Tarantino, while the Directorâ€™s Guild chose Hooper. But the Oscars have a longstanding tradition of awarding the fifth slot to a â€śvisionaryâ€ť director who tends to get unfairly ignored elsewhere (what I like to call the Terrence Malick Memorial Nomination). This year, there are two obvious choices for that slot, Anderson and Haneke. Itâ€™s basically a 50/50 toss-up, but Iâ€™m giving the edge to Anderson, just because his career is a little more user-friendly than Haneke, whose films often stretch viewer patience to the limits. But it should be noted that Amour is regarded as the most accessible film of Hanekeâ€™s career, while The Master is undoubtedly the most inaccessible of Andersonâ€™s, so Haneke taking this slot definitely wouldnâ€™t be a shock.
Daniel Day Lewis â€“ Lincoln
The Near Locks
John Hawkes â€“ The Sessions
Denzel Washington â€“ Flight
Hugh Jackman â€“ Les Miserables
Joaquin Phoenix â€“ The Master
Bradley Cooper â€“ Silver Linings Playbook
Better Luck Next Year
Richard Gere â€“ Arbitrage
Anthony Hopkins â€“ Hitchcock
Bill Murray â€“ Hyde Park Hudson
Jack Black â€“ Bernie
This is an immensely difficult category for me to analyze objectively, because I thought Phoenixâ€™s performance wasnâ€™t just the best of the year, but among the five or ten best acting performances Iâ€™ve ever seen. And because of this I find it unfathomable that he wouldnâ€™t make the field of five, despite any evidence to the contrary, and regardless of how many comments he makes about not caring. So Iâ€™m going with my gut, and predicting heâ€™ll find himself a nomination, because I desperately want to believe that quality of that magnitude matters more than the politics of how this all works.
Now having said that, the safe bet is that Jackman and Cooper will be the final two nominees. But I think both are vulnerable, Jackman because a lot of people disliked Les Miserables, and Cooper because some see his performance as slight and lacking depth. Because of Jackmanâ€™s impeccable singing, Iâ€™d give him the edge. And Richard Gere is looming as a potential spoiler. He already received a Golden Globe nomination for Arbitrage, and heâ€™s been campaigning hard. Plus heâ€™s never gotten an Oscar nomination, which some voters may see as an oversight thatâ€™s due to be corrected.
Jennifer Lawrence â€“ Silver Linings Playbook
Jessica Chastain â€“ Zero Dark Thirty
Someone Has To Get Left Out
Naomi Watts â€“ The Impossible
Helen Mirren â€“ Hitchcock
Emmanuelle Riva â€“ Amour
Marion Cotilard â€“ Rust and Bone
Unlikely (But You Never Know)
Judi Dench â€“ The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
Rachel Weisz â€“ The Deep Blue Sea
QuvenzhanĂ© Wallis â€“ Beasts of the Southern Wild
Maggie Smith â€“ Quartet
This is already seen as such a two-(wo)man race that the other five nominees feel virtually inconsequential. And yet, arguing over the inconsequential is what Iâ€™m here for! I think Watts is basically a sure thing for her physically demanding performance, and Mirren should get in on name-recognition alone. So itâ€™s down to Riva and Cotillard for the last slot, and both are in French subtitled films that many voters will have to talk themselves into watching. But Amour is light-hearted and beautiful, while Rust and Bone is heavy and depressing. That may be the deciding factor between which screener makes it to the DVD player and which screener stays on the coffee table. Plus Riva, at 85 years old, would be the oldest Best Actress nominee in history, and voters love a good narrative to latch on to.
While I wouldnâ€™t rule out Dench and Weiszâ€”two beloved actresses who consistently churn out great workâ€”I am ruling out Wallis. I know other people are predicting sheâ€™ll make the cut, but, as Mark Harris wrote on Grantland last summer, what she does isnâ€™t even really acting. Sheâ€™s six years old, so itâ€™s not like sheâ€™s really considering the different ways to approach a scene. And Wallis even said as much when asked about her performance. She just said that was just her up on the screen. While this certainly doesnâ€™t take away from how good she is, itâ€™s also distinctly non-Oscar worthy.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Tommy Lee Jones â€“ Lincoln
Philip Seymour Hoffman â€“ The Master
The Near Lock
Alan Arkin â€“ Argo
Javier Bardem â€“ Skyfall
Leonardo DiCaprio â€“ Django Unchained
Christoph Waltz â€“ Django Unchained
Robert De Niro â€“ Silver Linings Playbook
Matthew McConaughey â€“ Magic Mike
Ewan McGregor â€“ The Impossible
Samuel L. Jackson â€“ Django Unchained
This is a fascinating category, because of the seven legitimate contenders for a nomination, six have already won Oscars, and five of them have already won in this category. Because of this, I really like DiCaprioâ€™s chances for a nomination, as voters might see him as the only breath of fresh air in a category filled with people who probably donâ€™t need any more accolades.
Out of the four actors vying for the final two slots, I think De Niro is the closest thing to a longshot, because it could be argued that this is his first role in over a decade that wasnâ€™t simple check cashing. And it might be hard for voters to talk themselves into rewarding that. Iâ€™m also operating on the assumption that Bardem is pretty close to a lock. He didnâ€™t get a Golden Globe nomination, but heâ€™s on SAGâ€™s list, and voters who loved Skyfall (and apparently, they are legion) will probably feel like this is the best chance to reward that film. Plus, after 22 other Bond movies, coming up with a totally refreshing and totally creepy villain ainâ€™t no easy task. And thereâ€™s recent history of this award going to the yearâ€™s best villain, which happened three years in a row from 2007-2009.
The real question here will be whether DiCaprio and Waltz split each otherâ€™s votes, and even if Samuel L. Jackson siphons some away from both of them. But DiCaprio is playing both a supporting role and a villain for the first time in his adult career, and that should gain not just the curiosity of the voters, but also their attention.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
The Winner Lock
Anne HathawayÂ – Les Miserables
The Near Locks
Sally Field â€“ Lincoln
Amy Adams â€“ The Master
Helen Hunt â€“ The Sessions
Maggie Smith â€“ The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
Nicole Kidman â€“ The Paperboy
Ann Dowd â€“ Compliance
Jacki Weaver â€“ Silver Linings Playbook
Samantha Barks â€“ Les Miserables
Kerry Washington â€“ Django Unchained
This feels like kind of a boring category because Hathaway appears to have it in the bag, but whether or not Kidman can sneak into the field will be one of the most interesting elements of the nominations. And thatâ€™s because The Paperboy is a legitimately awful movie. To be fair, Kidman is quite good as its southern-fried sexpot, and there are (fleeting) stretches where she almost makes the movie tolerable. But getting voters to watch their screener copy given the savage reviews heaped upon the movie is no easy task, while Hunt and Smith (Kidmanâ€™s most vulnerable competitors) are both in happy feel-good movies that voters will likely love watching. And thatâ€™s why I think Kidman will sit this one out despite getting nominated by both the Golden Globes and the Screen Actorâ€™s Guild.
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
The Winner Lock
Mark Boal – Zero Dark Thirty
The Near Lock
Wes Anderson & Roman Coppola – Moonrise Kingdom
Anything Could Happen
Rian Johnson – LooperÂ Â Â Â
Quentin Tarantino – Django UnchainedÂ Â Â Â
Paul Thomas Anderson – The Master
Michael Haneke – Amour
John Gatins – Flight
Zero Dark Thirty is the only sure thing here, and I can imagine virtually any scenario for the other four nominees. But ultimately I think Flight will fall short because itâ€™s seen as more of an achievement for Denzel Washington and the special effects team, and I think Amour is more likely to get honored in other categories. Plus Tarantino and Anderson are such mainstays of this category that itâ€™s hard to picture either of them getting left out.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
Tony Kushner – Lincoln
Chris Terrio – ArgoÂ Â Â Â
David O. Russell – Silver Linings Playbook
The Near Lock
David Magee – Life of Pi
One of These
Stephen Chbosky – The Perks of Being a Wallflower
Ben Lewin – The Sessions
Lucy Alibar & Benh Zeitlin – Beasts of the Southern Wild
Weâ€™re really only debating the last slot here. While Beasts of the Southern Wild is probably the most loved film of the likely possibilities, and I happen to think The Sessions is the most deserving, the consensus seems to be that Wallflower will claim the last slot. Stephen Chbosky adapted his own novel for the screenplay, which is probably nerve-racking, and this is likely the only category for voters to recognize the film.
Daniel Joyaux is a film and pop culture critic living in Ann Arbor. You can read more of his work atÂ thirdmanmovies.blogspot.comÂ and follow him on Twitter @thirdmanmovies.